上海公交车爆燃事件

新华网上海5月5日电(记者杨金志、刘丹)5日上午9时左右,上海杨浦区黄兴路靠近国权路附近一辆842路公交车发生火灾,目前警方确认已有3人死亡,12人受伤。火灾原因正在调查之中。 更多新闻请见:http://www.yangtse.com/sytj/tpxw/200805/t20080505_441798.htm

有时候很难相信,这样的事情就发生在身边。地铁会夹死人,火车会飞出轨,公交车会爆炸燃烧,现代城市生活一点也不安全。

不晓得那三位遇难者是谁,他们的家庭一定承受了巨大的痛苦。为他们默哀兼担心:警方公布火灾初步原因系乘客携带易燃物品上车所致,公交车不允许带易燃易爆品都宣传了N年了,怎么样才能预防这样的事件再次发生呢?

重装上阵之Zoundry

话说前阵子我的电脑重装了一回,后果自然是,突然恢复了裸机运行,Zoundry也没有了,没法离线发布博客;相片编辑器也不见了,没法上载照片到yupoo,甚至连winrar也没有了,结果现在有一堆rar放在电脑里边没法看呢。

一直没找到时间来慢慢整理,今天先重装Zoundry吧。这一重装,才发现,人家已经升级换代到Zoundry Raven 0.9.284 beta版了。粗粗一看,加了分类,以及贴图功能,还加了ping选择,说是可以将自己的文章备份到网上。不过没看到ping抓虾的选择,而且还是不能支持通过代理服务器发布。看来还得继续装 Windows Live Writer.

先写到这儿吧,回头发现有趣的再说。

北京

温度适宜,风沙不小。

交通还是没准,下班时间,俺从北五环挨到北二环足足用了一个半小时。

四星酒店硬件不错,然而服务有待改善。多数服务员和颜悦色,少数面目可憎,但不晓得为什么大家都老犯低级服务错误。空调温度不能调,洗澡水不热,浴室天花板摇摇欲坠,没有房间送餐菜单,清晨服务生在走廊上大声喧哗,弄错客人名字,算错房费……

紫禁城周围垂柳依依,还是挺美的。故宫大修,三大殿都围起来了,看不出端倪。剩下的那些部分破旧得不成样子,比8年前去的时候差多了,直接从50岁跃入70岁。

据说重修是为了迎奥运,不晓得奥运之时,紫禁城是否修旧如旧,还能看得出当年的样子?

鸟巢和水立方白天看过去都有点脏,特别水立方,灰蓝灰蓝的,好似沾了粉尘。有点失望。

湖广会馆的京戏不错,可惜编排和设计还不足,厕所很脏。考虑到主要目标是老外,而且一个人一小时平均200多的价格,性价比不高。

有一帮朋友要碰,可惜没时间,最后和家人一起到后海尝了尝全聚德,鸭子还是没变,挺好吃的。

财富专访 Steve Jobs

感觉St. Job 说起话来神叨叨牛烘烘的,确实挺有煽动力。听完了偶就想,要是能去Apple和这些牛人工作,可以考虑降点薪水,呵呵。

中文译文见http://apple4.us/2008/03/post-62.html。翻译得还挺通顺的,就是少了点神气。

AMERICA’S MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES
Steve Jobs speaks out
In an exclusive interview, Apple’s CEO talked with Fortune senior editor Betsy Morris in February in Kona, Hawaii, where he was vacationing with his family, about the keys to the company’s success, the prospect of Apple without Jobs, and more. Here are excerpts.

1 of 15
On the birth of the iPhone
“We all had cellphones. We just hated them, they were so awful to use. The software was terrible. The hardware wasn’t very good. We talked to our friends, and they all hated their cellphones too. Everybody seemed to hate their phones. And we saw that these things really could become much more powerful and interesting to license. It’s a huge market. I mean a billion phones get shipped every year, and that’s almost an order of magnitude greater than the number of music players. It’s four times the number of PCs that ship every year.
“It was a great challenge. Let’s make a great phone that we fall in love with. And we’ve got the technology. We’ve got the miniaturization from the iPod. We’ve got the sophisticated operating system from Mac. Nobody had ever thought about putting operating systems as sophisticated as OS X inside a phone, so that was a real question. We had a big debate inside the company whether we could do that or not. And that was one where I had to adjudicate it and just say, ‘We’re going to do it. Let’s try.’ The smartest software guys were saying they can do it, so let’s give them a shot. And they did.”
LAST UPDATED MARCH 07 2008: 7:10 PM ET
On Apple’s connection with the consumer
“We did iTunes because we all love music. We made what we thought was the best jukebox in iTunes. Then we all wanted to carry our whole music libraries around with us. The team worked really hard. And the reason that they worked so hard is because we all wanted one. You know? I mean, the first few hundred customers were us.
“It’s not about pop culture, and it’s not about fooling people, and it’s not about convincing people that they want something they don’t. We figure out what we want. And I think we’re pretty good at having the right discipline to think through whether a lot of other people are going to want it, too. That’s what we get paid to do.
“So you can’t go out and ask people, you know, what the next big [thing.] There’s a great quote by Henry Ford, right? He said, ‘If I’d have asked my customers what they wanted, they would have told me “A faster horse.” ‘ ”
On choosing strategy
“We do no market research. We don’t hire consultants. The only consultants I’ve ever hired in my 10 years is one firm to analyze Gateway’s retail strategy so I would not make some of the same mistakes they made [when launching Apple’s retail stores]. But we never hire consultants, per se. We just want to make great products.
“When we created the iTunes Music Store, we did that because we thought it would be great to be able to buy music electronically, not because we had plans to redefine the music industry. I mean, it just seemed like writing on the wall, that eventually all music would be distributed electronically. That seemed obvious because why have the cost? The music industry has huge returns. Why have all this [overhead] when you can just send electrons around easily?”
LAST UPDATED MARCH 07 2008: 7:10 PM ET
On what drives Apple employees
“We don’t get a chance to do that many things, and every one should be really excellent. Because this is our life. Life is brief, and then you die, you know? So this is what we’ve chosen to do with our life. We could be sitting in a monastery somewhere in Japan. We could be out sailing. Some of the [executive team] could be playing golf. They could be running other companies. And we’ve all chosen to do this with our lives. So it better be damn good. It better be worth it. And we think it is.”
On why people want to work at Apple:
“The reason is, is because you can’t do what you can do at Apple anywhere else. The engineering is long gone in most PC companies. In the consumer electronics companies, they don’t understand the software parts of it. And so you really can’t make the products that you can make at Apple anywhere else right now. Apple’s the only company that has everything under one roof.
“There’s no other company that could make a MacBook Air and the reason is that not only do we control the hardware, but we control the operating system. And it is the intimate interaction between the operating system and the hardware that allows us to do that. There is no intimate interaction between Windows and a Dell notebook.
“Our DNA is as a consumer company — for that individual customer who’s voting thumbs up or thumbs down. That’s who we think about. And we think that our job is to take responsibility for the complete user experience. And if it’s not up to par, it’s our fault, plain and simply.”
LAST UPDATED MARCH 07 2008: 7:10 PM ET
On whether Apple could live without him
“We’ve got really capable people at Apple. I made Tim [Cook] COO and gave him the Mac division and he’s done brilliantly. I mean, some people say, ‘Oh, God, if [Jobs] got run over by a bus, Apple would be in trouble.’ And, you know, I think it wouldn’t be a party, but there are really capable people at Apple. And the board would have some good choices about who to pick as CEO. My job is to make the whole executive team good enough to be successors, so that’s what I try to do.”
On his demanding reputation:
“My job is to not be easy on people. My job is to make them better. My job is to pull things together from different parts of the company and clear the ways and get the resources for the key projects. And to take these great people we have and to push them and make them even better, coming up with more aggressive visions of how it could be.”
LAST UPDATED MARCH 07 2008: 7:10 PM ET
On Apple’s focus
“Apple is a $30 billion company, yet we’ve got less than 30 major products. I don’t know if that’s ever been done before. Certainly the great consumer electronics companies of the past had thousands of products. We tend to focus much more. People think focus means saying yes to the thing you’ve got to focus on. But that’s not what it means at all. It means saying no to the hundred other good ideas that there are. You have to pick carefully.
“I’m actually as proud of many of the things we haven’t done as the things we have done. The clearest example was when we were pressured for years to do a PDA, and I realized one day that 90% of the people who use a PDA only take information out of it on the road. They don’t put information into it. Pretty soon cellphones are going to do that, so the PDA market’s going to get reduced to a fraction of its current size, and it won’t really be sustainable. So we decided not to get into it. If we had gotten into it, we wouldn’t have had the resources to do the iPod. We probably wouldn’t have seen it coming.”
LAST UPDATED MARCH 07 2008: 7:10 PM ET
On his management style
“We’ve got 25,000 people at Apple. About 10,000 of them are in the stores. And my job is to work with sort of the top 100 people, that’s what I do. That doesn’t mean they’re all vice presidents. Some of them are just key individual contributors. So when a good idea comes, you know, part of my job is to move it around, just see what different people think, get people talking about it, argue with people about it, get ideas moving among that group of 100 people, get different people together to explore different aspects of it quietly, and, you know – just explore things.”
On finding talent:
“When I hire somebody really senior, competence is the ante. They have to be really smart. But the real issue for me is, Are they going to fall in love with Apple?
Because if they fall in love with Apple, everything else will take care of itself. They’ll want to do what’s best for Apple, not what’s best for them, what’s best for Steve, or anybody else.
“Recruiting is hard. It’s just finding the needles in the haystack. We do it ourselves and we spend a lot of time at it. I’ve participated in the hiring of maybe 5,000-plus people in my life. So I take it very seriously. You can’t know enough in a one-hour interview. So, in the end, it’s ultimately based on your gut. How do I feel about this person? What are they like when they’re challenged? Why are they here? I ask everybody that: ‘Why are you here?’ The answers themselves are not what you’re looking for. It’s the meta-data.”
On the benefits of owning an operating system
“That allows us to innovate at a much faster rate than if we had to wait for Microsoft, like Dell and HP and everybody else does. Because Microsoft has their own timetable, for probably good reasons. I mean Vista took what — seven or eight years? It’s hard to get your new feature that you need for your new hardware if it has to wait eight years. So we can set our own priorities and look at things in a more holistic way from the point of view of the customer. It also means that we can take it and we can make a version of it to fit in the iPhone and the iPod. And, you know, we certainly couldn’t do that if we didn’t own it.”
On his marathon Monday meetings
“When you hire really good people you have to give them a piece of the business and let them run with it. That doesn’t mean I don’t get to kibitz a lot. But the reason you’re hiring them is because you’re going to give them the reins. I want [them] making as good or better decisions than I would. So the way to do that is to have them know everything, not just in their part of the business, but in every part of the business.
“So what we do every Monday is we review the whole business. We look at what we sold the week before. We look at every single product under development, products we’re having trouble with, products where the demand is larger than we can make. All the stuff in development, we review. And we do it every single week. I put out an agenda — 80% is the same as it was the last week, and we just walk down it every single week.
“We don’t have a lot of process at Apple, but that’s one of the few things we do just to all stay on the same page.”
On dealing with roadblocks
“At Pixar when we were making Toy Story, there came a time when we were forced to admit that the story wasn’t great. It just wasn’t great. We stopped production for five months…. We paid them all to twiddle their thumbs while the team perfected the story into what became Toy Story. And if they hadn’t had the courage to stop, there would have never been a Toy Story the way it is, and there probably would have never been a Pixar.
“We called that the ‘story crisis,’ and we never expected to have another one. But you know what? There’s been one on every film. We don’t stop production for five months. We’ve gotten a little smarter about it. But there always seems to come a moment where it’s just not working, and it’s so easy to fool yourself – to convince yourself that it is when you know in your heart that it isn’t.
“Well, you know what? It’s been that way with [almost] every major project at Apple, too…. Take the iPhone. We had a different enclosure design for this iPhone until way too close to the introduction to ever change it. And I came in one Monday morning, I said, ‘I just don’t love this. I can’t convince myself to fall in love with this. And this is the most important product we’ve ever done.’
“And we pushed the reset button. We went through all of the zillions of models we’d made and ideas we’d had. And we ended up creating what you see here as the iPhone, which is dramatically better. It was hell because we had to go to the team and say, ‘All this work you’ve [done] for the last year, we’re going to have to throw it away and start over, and we’re going to have to work twice as hard now because we don’t have enough time.’ And you know what everybody said? ‘Sign us up.’
“That happens more than you think, because this is not just engineering and science. There is art, too. Sometimes when you’re in the middle of one of these crises, you’re not sure you’re going to make it to the other end. But we’ve always made it, and so we have a certain degree of confidence, although sometimes you wonder. I think the key thing is that we’re not all terrified at the same time. I mean, we do put our heart and soul into these things.”
On the iPod tipping point
“It was difficult for a while because for various reasons the Mac had not been accepted by a lot of people, who went with Windows. And we were just working really hard, and our market share wasn’t going up. It makes you wonder sometimes whether you’re wrong. Maybe our stuff isn’t better, although we thought it was. Or maybe people don’t care, which is even more depressing.
“It turns out with the iPod we kind of got out from that operating-system glass ceiling and it was great because [it showed that] Apple innovation, Apple engineering, Apple design did matter. The iPod captured 70% market share. I cannot tell you how important that was after so many years of laboring and seeing a 4% to 5% market share on the Mac. To see something like that happen with the iPod was a great shot in the arm for everybody.”
On what they did next:
“We made more. We worked harder. We said: ‘This is great. Let’s do more.’ I mean, the Mac market share is going up every single quarter. We’re growing four times faster than the industry. People are starting to pay a little more attention. We’ve helped it along. We put Intel processors in and we can run PC apps alongside Mac apps. We helped it along. But I think a lot of it is people have finally started to realize that they don’t have to put up with Windows – that there is an alternative. I think nobody really thought about it that way before.”
LAST UPDATED MARCH 07 2008: 7:10 PM ET
On launching the Apple store
“It was very simple. The Mac faithful will drive to a destination, right? They’ll drive somewhere special just to do that. But people who own Windows – we want to convert them to Mac. They will not drive somewhere special. They don’t think they want a Mac. They will not take the risk of a 20-minute drive in case they don’t like it.
“But if we put our store in a mall or on a street that they’re walking by, and we reduce that risk from a 20-minute drive to 20 footsteps, then they’re more likely to go in because there’s really no risk. So we decided to put our stores in high-traffic locations. And it works.”
On catching tech’s next wave
“Things happen fairly slowly, you know. They do. These waves of technology, you can see them way before they happen, and you just have to choose wisely which ones you’re going to surf. If you choose unwisely, then you can waste a lot of energy, but if you choose wisely it actually unfolds fairly slowly. It takes years.
“One of our biggest insights [years ago] was that we didn’t want to get into any business where we didn’t own or control the primary technology because you’ll get your head handed to you.
“We realized that almost all – maybe all – of future consumer electronics, the primary technology was going to be software. And we were pretty good at software. We could do the operating system software. We could write applications on the Mac or even PC, like iTunes. We could write the software in the device, like you might put in an iPod or an iPhone or something. And we could write the back-end software that runs on a cloud, like iTunes.
“So we could write all these different kinds of software and make it work seamlessly. And you ask yourself, What other companies can do that? It’s a pretty short list. The reason that we were very excited about the phone, beyond that fact that we all hated our phones, was that we didn’t see anyone else who could make that kind of contribution. None of the handset manufacturers real
ly are strong in software.”
On failing, so far, with Apple TV
“Here’s how I look at it. Everybody’s tried to make a great product for the living room. Microsoft’s tried, we’ve tried — everybody’s tried. And everybody’s failed. We failed, so far.
“So there’s a whole bunch of people that have tried, and every single one of them’s failed, including us. And that’s why I call it a hobby. It’s not a business yet, it’s a hobby.
“We’ve come out with our second try — ‘Apple TV, Take 2’ is what we call it internally. We realized that the first product we did was about helping you view the content of whatever you had in iTunes on your Mac or PC, and wirelessly sending it to your widescreen TV.
“Well, it turns out that’s not what people really wanted to do. I mean, yeah, it’s nice to see your photos up on the big screen. That’s frosting on the cake, but it’s not the cake. What everybody really wanted, it turned out, was movies.
“So we began the process of talking to Hollywood studios and were able to get all the major studios to license their movies for rental. And we only have about 600 movies so far ingested on iTunes, but we’ll have thousands later this year. We lowered the price to $229. And we’ll see how it does. Will this resonate and be something that you just can’t live without and love? We’ll see. I think it’s got a shot.”

On managing through the economic downturn
“We’ve had one of these before, when the dot-com bubble burst. What I told our company was that we were just going to invest our way through the downturn, that we weren’t going to lay off people, that we’d taken a tremendous amount of effort to get them into Apple in the first place — the last thing we were going to do is lay them off. And we were going to keep funding. In fact we were going to up our R&D budget so that we would be ahead of our competitors when the downturn was over. And that’s exactly what we did. And it worked. And that’s exactly what we’ll do this time.”

卓越之乌龟传说

话说上回当当礼券风波闹过之后,俺就换了卓越订书。 结果不晓得是不是我的RP强大到见谁灭谁。换过去以后第一回就出事了。 这么说吧,为了能在春节前订点书看上,我在1月底下了个订单,说是2月3日到。订的时候正遇上全场免运费红色标语乱晃,让人看得心里暖洋洋的。心想,到底被Amazon收购了啊,有点儿财大气粗的样子了。 等啊等啊,2月3号到了,书还没发,说是5-6号发,又等啊等啊,春节假期慢悠悠过去了,还是没书看。又等啊等啊,到了出差了,还是没有书带着在路上看。 后来,再后来,俺终于回家了,才听northqj说,书是2月14号到的,一共折腾了半个月。就这么而且还收了5元的快递费,理由是,虽然卓越的首页上大幅标语写得免运费,但是,当每个人下订单的时候,默认是加急特快专递! 好啦,你收就收嘛,可是加急特快专递也, 从上海到温州也,走了多久呢? 15天也!就是牛车也到了。这么一说,northqj同学就在签收的时候就不答应啦,既然是特慢专递,就不该收这5元加急快递费嘛。 Joyo的人倒脾气好,一口就答应啦。回头客户服务部就打了电话过来,说钱是不能退了,那么给补5元礼券啦。 也罢,礼券虽小,总算表达了个认错的态度不是?那就算了吧。且慢! 2月29日,礼券没到。打电话问客服,说礼券已经申请啦,快要发出啦,明天查查信箱啊。结果一查,还是没有。 于是又打电话去问,客服部一头雾水,这个订单号没有任何投诉和申请啊!我再帮你申请一张吧。 如是者三。到现在3月眼看又要过去了,还是么有消息。 我们已经彻底放弃了,Joyo的客服比当当强。当当乃是练的凌波微步,没事绕来绕去,就是和你绕不清楚。Joyo呢,练的是缩头龟功,任你敲打,我就不出头,不留底,让你空花投诉电话费和精力,你能耐我何? 我是不能把你们怎么样。我只是觉得总说互联网啊,电子商务啊,如何如何高新科技啊,其实网络卖书,不过就做的物流和服务两项。如今从上海到温州,居然要走半个月,服务又如此之差,有网络有高科技有什么用呢? 一屋子高级机器,让一群乌龟操纵着,不还是在爬行动物时代么?

最近很忙,到了有点心力交瘁的地步。过去两周发生太多事情。

有时候会怀疑自己坚持的理由,有时候能得到一些支持又感觉到很高兴。

在矛盾和忙碌中艰难前行,希望自己能够成长。

做一个内心强大的人多么重要又多么不容易。

灵峰探梅 韩美林艺术馆

周末顺路又经过杭州,和cilia约定一起灵峰探梅!

从植物园进去的,往灵峰的路上经过韩美林艺术馆,早就听老爸老妈提起过,自然要进去看看的。

一楼是文献和雕塑,二楼是绘画和陶艺,三楼是书法和其他。

喜欢他很简洁但富有创造力的作品,比如几笔勾画出的小动物,还有一些同样风格的雕塑作品,他说艺术创作要理解数学和物理知识,我认为是大实话,不知道嘉振会有什么看法,呵呵。

至于他做的茶壶,呵呵,我这个外行人实在是觉得不怎么样。

一楼的文献介绍中,有几大长幅特别引起我们注意,上面密密麻麻有他亲自配画题字,与其说是书画,不如说是韩先生的人生感悟,令人唏嘘不已。

如果有兴趣的朋友可以去看看,毕竟国内作品这么丰富的艺术家是不多的,而把艺术馆放在植物园内,也不失一个好的尝试。

不能拍照,就从网上下了一张照片。

 

你看你看温州商人

觉得,温州人的一个特点,就是特别能钻。没有负面的意思,其实有点佩服,能钻,首先得头脑快,然后得有胆量还得有脸皮,还得眼快手疾,还得坚持。

比如这个例子,摘自洪晃博客,关于萨科齐的:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_476bdd0a01008ltd.html

“萨总是一个非常知道如何用悄皮话打发问题的人。看他吃完点心,我们开始按照安排每个人问他一个问题。他很油,打发几个老总不在话下,比如,有人问:希拉克总统和中国关系非常好,你接班了,会不会有变化?”

萨总答道:”当然会有变化, 变得更好呗!”

最后,他终于被均遥的小老总王均金给问倒了。

“萨科奇总统,”王总问道,“我要买法国飞机,你可以不可以给我一个总统折扣啊?”

萨总的第一个反映是笑得腿都翘起来了,然后他叫别人给王总报价,王总还是紧紧咬住总统折扣的事情,最后萨总只好说:“我是总统,不是商人。””

终于看电影了–Jodhaa Akbar

cilia看过的本年度最大的大片且最佳大片,Jodhaa Akbar。类似戏说阿克巴,据说中文译名为阿克巴大帝。

先上预告片和主题曲。

我挺喜欢的主题曲:

在豆瓣贴了个小评,如下:

给我一个看大片的理由

作为一个很少看大片的观众,我实在对国内的大片失望了,不过这回,在Jodhaa Akbar上映的第二周,我终于抵挡不住印度铺天盖地的宣传片和歌曲,忍不住买票进影院看这部连语言都不懂的片子。
  
  故事很简单,Akbar大帝和他的拉贾斯坦新娘Jodhaa的爱情故事。情节无甚新奇,连我这不懂印度语的也大致都理解了。
  
  主要是,
  
  同学们,俺只花了不到30块钱,整整看了3个多小时的超级豪华Cosplay加MTV啊!而且为超级帅哥和漂亮mm为主要模特!
  
  首先,片里糅合了一堆大片的流行元素还主调健康向上阳光浪漫。宏大的战争场面啦,神剑手啦,惊险的大帝同学徒手斗象啦,王的婚礼啦,邪恶的女巫啦,男一号二号PK啦,男主角如何过女主角的智慧关啦,男女主角比刀法啦,微服私访啦,最后结尾还死活塞了一场单挑场景。这些元素都不稀奇,不过让帅哥美女温习一遍特洛伊+角斗士+魔戒+泰山+戏说乾隆还是很愉快的。我最喜欢片中一处两人在斋浦尔的琥珀堡里PK剑法以及一处阳光照进Jodhaa的闺房,男女主角沐浴在一片彩色宝石镶满的房间里,金色镜子旁执手相看,OMG,我建议张某某同学观摩一次,然后出去忏悔。
  
  说到演员,女主角乃是前世界小姐,漂亮就不说了,难得兼具古典和现代气质,扮演公主的角色,外表要求之高,需要看上去纯洁,高贵又气质,这位mm,嘿嘿,俺的结论是比国内什么一线女星扮起来都像个公主。
  
  男主角就更难得,娱乐界花旦难得,小生更难。对这个男主角,俺么啥可说的, 反正比起这位“王”,俺觉得以前在大片里看过的王不是太猥琐,就是太肥或太老,或秀气有余贵气不足,或帅气有余阳刚不足。或者什么都不错,就长得太现代….
  
  好吧,除了男女主角摆了各种漂亮pose以外,最令人震撼的不过片中的时装珠宝秀啦,王和王后么,漂亮衣服和珠宝当然系天天换,但是每个造型都很漂亮而且耐看,这就难得啦。大片当然要砸钱,问题是人家砸在满身满脚的珠宝上,砸在金线密织的丝绸上,让我们有场视觉盛宴,我们呢,全砸菊花上了,除了体现强烈的农民意识,啥也没了。
  
  最后是音乐,配乐一般,不过几首主题歌曲都挺不错的。其中有一首颇似《大长今》主题曲。要说遗憾就两点,故事弱智点,还有武打设计和国内还是不能比的,我强烈怀念袁和平老兄。
  
  好啦,总之看完了这影片,我的想法就是,大片并非不能拍,也未必没人看,主要是,您老人家手里握了几亿人民币,能不能别砸在乱伦阴暗的故事情节上,别砸在不够帅不够漂亮的演员上,别砸在阴森森的室内场景里,别砸在菊花田里啊!

朔门街 猪脏粉和麦饼

听说朔门街乃是温州新出现的好玩地方,特地找了个下午和northqj同去。

朔门街其实就在江滨解放街那里,原来都是老房子,后来政府重新翻修过,驻扎了些商户进去,据说有点阳朔西街的味道。

去的时候,正是下午时分,天阴阴的,又是年关,不免觉得冷清些。

街不长,商铺与民宅相间,所以很容易见到白发老太太施施然从某酒吧边走过的景象,颇有意思。

沿街不少个性小店,譬如伊索城什么的。个性小店的东西看得眼熟,想来多是从别的地方买来的,原创的不多。还有间茶馆,本想和northqj一探究竟,结果被人家一口拒绝,理由是,如此装修,恐怕醉翁之意不在茶,如果又贵茶又不好,岂不扫兴?

想想也对,遂继续前行。

没事吧。这里酒吧不少,且大多名儿有趣,什么没事吧,一起吧,外表也简朴,可惜有些都没开门。如果坐在吧内看冬日阳光,喝两口淡茶,想来不错。

看下来最有意思的一家店,是家玩桌上游戏的,只见店里堆满了奇形怪状的棋子卡片等物,店主介绍说,这些都是德国的桌上游戏,只要交钱坐下来,就有人负责教你玩,按时间收钱。收费不贵,一人一小时八块,周末也不过十块。如果叫上一群朋友,周末到这里来杀时间,像当年玩跳棋一般,肯定会颇有趣。可惜当日日已西斜,northqj又不晓得为啥不愿意与我对弈,只得郁闷地离开。

走出朔门街,是个平常破旧的小巷子,靠着大门就是一家猪脏粉。据说猪脏粉乃温州名小吃,不可不尝。只见小店破烂,店内煤球堆得山高,仿佛沙县小吃一般。不一会儿,一大碗热气腾腾的粉就上来了。一看,乃是猪大肠和猪血卧在米粉里,香气扑鼻。

说实话,好多年没吃过这么干净这么脆的大肠了,虽然northqj说只是一般,但对于我这外乡客来说,却是美食。

吃完猪脏粉,前行几步,又走不动了。江滨路边上赫然有一家“东门名小吃”–永嘉麦饼。所谓麦饼,乃是烤得焦脆的硬饼里裹着梅干菜肥肉,此种搭配可谓天才配。因饼壳没有味道,只一味麦香,正配着馅的丰满浓烈;不仅如此,饼壳的脆硬干酥正搭着内馅的柔软缠绵,叫麦饼真有点谦虚了。

看来一个老一点的城市,一定有些特色的小吃,只可惜如今不少“特色风味”已经越来越走味了,否则当我们旅游时,时时能够遭遇惊喜,该是多么有趣的一件事情。

P.S.猪脏粉那家,名字就叫猪脏粉,里面也卖馄饨、敲鱼和鱼丸。麦饼那家名字也就叫永嘉麦饼,在取名上如此牛法,又见街头小吃彪悍的一面。